Archive for January, 2012

Power in the Courtroom – Creating a Dynamic Presence As a Litigator

January 15th, 2012

Have you ever considered why we need trial lawyers in the first place? Why not have a judge or clerk–or the manager of the court’s cafeteria–simply read the facts of a case to a jury? Cases could be presented in days, a week at the most. Another day or two of jury deliberation and that would be it. Think of the money attorneys would save on bottled water and mints alone!

Well, although ancient Athens would identify with trials being held that way, our court system depends upon a quite different concept: advocacy. We depend upon professionals who marry a lawsuit’s complexity with recognized skills in presentation. Our system of justice depends upon legal theater. And in this world, just as on Broadway, performance matters.

Political consultant Roger Ailes understood the meeting of self and message when he titled his 1988 book You Are the Message. As an advocate, you must create a persuasive persona that unites your professional acumen with skill in courtroom performance.

Challenging? You bet. So take it from a former professional actor: Here are three areas of focus you should work within to achieve the dynamism and persuasiveness that you owe your client–not to mention your own satisfaction and personal success:

Competence

Advertise your competence in everything you say and do in the courtroom. This does not mean strutting and sounding boastful. It means exhibiting a quiet confidence that equals an unforced display of authority. Trust yourself and your abilities while you show that you enjoy what you’re doing. Look prepared, calm, and eager to advocate on behalf of your client. Avoid the appearance of being rushed and harassed (by time constraints, rulings that don’t go your way, or by the judge himself or herself.) And don’t make a frown your facial signature.

Remember that your presentation begins the moment the jury sees you, and continues at all times, not only when you are speaking. Get on a wavelength when you’re within the jury’s sight of energy, confidence, and professionalism. Make your eye contact solid and lasting. Move crisply. Instead of shuffling papers noisily at your counsel table, treat them with respect (I’m not kidding!). The manner in which you hold yourself and move–commanding the space around you instead of wandering, lonely as Wordsworth’s clouds–makes a tremendous difference in how you are perceived. Let jurors know by everything you show them that you are a person of authority and humility (yes, combined), and so your client deserves a high level of respect. And by all means, understanding the difference between authority and arrogance, and know how to exhibit one and not the other.

Rapport

Don’t just identify with the jurors – love them, and let it show. Voir dire should have helped you empanel a group of people who could identify with your client and understand the client’s actions. When you relate to jurors from now on in any way, do it within a world of common ground you share. Whoever we are as human beings, our experiences, motivations, and feelings unite all of us far more than they divide us. Look for ways to remind jurors of this in terms of the evidence, courtroom procedures, the burdens being placed on these people in slow-moving trials, and your own client if he or she testifies. Speak to and treat people with empathy and respect. If you don’t know what that sounds like in spoken communication, get a colleague to help.

Be genuine and believable. And remember to be interesting! Flush your brain of legalese, and speak in words that are concrete, compact, and vivid. Read Churchill’s speeches if you don’t understand what I mean by this. Think at all times in terms of story, and you’ll have the captive and sympathetic audience you’re looking for. And never forget: your yellow legal pad is your enemy. If you look at your notes when talking to the jury or witnesses instead of the human beings involved, you deserve to lose.

Delivery

Believe. Like Peter and Wendy in Peter Pan — believe. A famous acting textbook is called Acting Is Believing, and every lawyer and advocate of any kind should remember that title in terms of their own work. Actors know that to convince others, they must be convinced themselves. So, beyond your law school degree, the prestige of your profession, your firm’s reputation, and your renown as a trial lawyer, believe with all your professional being in the truth of your advocacy.

If you fiercely embody your argument, you will succeed in getting your listeners to think and feel what you want them to. And that means doing what you want them to in the jury room.

Make your vocal delivery honest as well. Eloquence rarely moves people; honesty always does. The art of connecting your emotions to your voice–a bedrock skill of successful advocates–means speaking simply about the human feelings that underlie your messages. All the important things in life are spoken simply from the heart, using small words. The late mystery novelist Ed McBain had one of his characters say: “The truth had a ring like an ax hitting an oak.” You’d better believe it–and if you do, your listeners will believe it too.

What Is The Criminal Defense Lawyer Association?

January 15th, 2012

The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is an organization with more than 47,000 members; either directly or through affiliates. It was formed in 1958 with the intent to “Ensure justice and due process for persons accused of crime. Foster the integrity, independence and expertise of the criminal defense profession. Promote the proper and fair administration of criminal justice.”

It is a forum for members to discuss law and its application, to share updates on technologies, techniques and theories that promote criminal defense advocacy; provide meetings, seminars and publications for same; and allow the public to access the website to find a lawyer in their time of need.

Lawyers that join NACDL (or one of its state affiliates) have taken their oath of office a step further, going ‘above and beyond’ what is required, to the ideal put forth in the Constitution and Bill of Rights of the United States, that ALL people, the indigent as well as the wealthy deserve due process, which includes the lawyer working to the utmost of his or her capabilities; as well as adhering to these credos even in the face of changes to laws and ‘streamlining procedures’ that threaten to erode these Constitutional guarantees.

Among the beliefs that lawyers of this association adhere to is that victims and witnesses should be treated with compassion, rather than being put on trial themselves; a right to privacy in person, property and communication; a right to counsel of their own choosing- without it being used against them; and a policy of sentencing punishment in keeping with the crime, not mandatory requirements that are unaffected by circumstance or intent.

They advocate prevention and true rehabilitation rather than an incarceration and release approach that generally only causes a downward spiral of habitual (and worse) offenses. To promote this within the organization, there are annual awards given to recognize those members that have excelled even at this higher level of dedication.

As an open forum, all levels of government- national, state or local, can access or present information that provides additional insights or interpretations of past rulings; scientific communities working in forensics or mental and biological health can present advancements in technology or new data on research into various conditions and diseases and how they may affect or interact with a person’s judgment or capabilities at any given time.

This allows the organization to disseminate as widely and quickly as possible new information when it becomes available.

Within the NACDL website itself, there is an area for members only, where they can privately discuss questions, problems, or new information among their peers so that a consensus can be reached.

By working to uphold the Constitutional view of law, the NACDL hopes to return the country to the principals on which it was founded, and not allow fear, greed, or apathy to erode our system of criminal justice.